Psychology 101: Introductory Psychology
Fall 2006--Professor Fong
Information About the Final Examination
and Review Questions
About the Final
Examination
The final examination
will be held on Saturday, December 16, 7:30-10 p.m.
PLEASE NOTE THAT
THE LOCATION IS STILL BEING WORKED OUT. UPDATE: the final will be held in
6 rooms. See the Final Exam Home Page or the
Psych 101 Home Page for the listing of the rooms.
The final examination
will be closed-book, of course, and will consist of multiple choice questions
(from the textbook) and short answer questions (from the material covered in
the lectures).
I have changed the
nature of the final examination so that it is only partially cumulative
(originally, as indicated in the course outline, the final was to be fully
cumulative). The final examination will now consist of three parts:
1. Midterm #3—everyone
will take this REQUIRED section, which will consist of:
€ Multiple choice from
Chapters 14, 16, 17, 18 (remember that for MT2 we had skipped Ch 14 and
included Ch 15). In other words,
the multiple choice section will cover the remaining chapters of the Myers
textbook. There will be 7 multiple
choice questions from each of the 4 chapters, for a total of 28 questions.
[Note—the fact that there are 7 MC questions for each chapter does NOT
mean that the MC section is proportionately any greater than it has been for
MT1 or MT2, because the point totals for MT3 will still be approximately 50% MC
and 50% short answer. I just had to include more MC questions so that the point
totals work out. You don't have to study any more to answer 7 questions per
chapter than you would to answer 5 questions.]
€ Short answer questions from: (1) the material covered since Midterm
#2 (starting with the lecture material on learning (Questions 206-223) as well
as the material on memory. Please note that, although this MT3/Final is NOT
fully comprehensive, there will be the possibility of short answer questions on
the material from my lectures on research methodology (Questions #11 to 40 on
the Midterm 1 Review Questions). These questions are repeated below.
2. OPTIONAL second chance questions from
Midterm #1 material (short answer questions from my lectures only; no multiple
choice!)
€ If you would like to
improve your original Midterm 1 score, you can answer these questions. You can look over the questions, and
even answer some or all of them. There will be a place on the cover sheet where
you can indicate that you want us to grade these second chance Midterm 1
questions. If you do so, your
Revised Midterm 1 score will be the simple average of your original Midterm 1
score and your Second Change Midterm 1 score:
Revised
Midterm 1 % = (Transformed % of entire original MT1 + % on Second Chance MT1) / 2
* this is the transformed percentage, not the
raw percentage If you decide
that you don't want us to grade this section, even if you have answered
the questions, there will be a place to indicate that you don't want us to (and
thus, you would let your original Midterm 1 score stand). If you choose to
have us grade this section, the above formula will be used, even if you do
worse on these second chance questions than you did on Midterm 1. Please note that even though the original
Midterm #1 had a multiple choice and a short answer section, and this second
chance Midterm #1 has only a short answer section, that second chance Midterm
#1 will be averaged with your total original Midterm #1 score (in other
words, we are not simply replacing or averaging just your short answer
score). 3. OPTIONAL second chance questions from
Midterm 2 material (short answer questions from my lectures only; no multiple
choice) € Same
procedure as for Midterm 1 second chance questions, and same averaging
procedure. Weighting the
Components of the Course Please note that because the final examination is now
equal to Midterm 3, I need to change the weights: Component Original
weights Revised
weights Midterm #1 28% 32% Midterm #2 28% 32% Final Exam 40% 32% (Midterm #3) Experiment/article summaries 4% (+ up to 4%
bonus) 4% (+ up to 4%
bonus) Answers to the
Review Questions and Psych 101 Hot Line 1. I
will be audio-recording the answers to the review sessions below, and will be
converting it to MP3. Those MP3 files will be available on the Psych 101 final
website by Tuesday, December 12, early afternoon. You can download the
file(s), which you can then play on your iPod or other MP3 player, right next
to songs from our niece: http://www.mozellamusic.com/
and http://www.myspace.com/mozella 2. Final
call for the Psych 101 Hot Line: Friday, December 15, from 9:30 to 10:30 p.m.
Phone
number: 519-886-4732. Experimental Summaries and Article Summaries The
deadline has been extended to Monday, December 11. You MUST submit them by NOON in the
mailboxes of one of the TAs (preferably Ada Law's mailbox, because she is the
administrative TA for the course). The mailboxes for the Psych Dept are on the
3rd floor of the PAS building. Just ask if you can't find them. And PLEASE make
a photocopy or disk copy of anything you turn in: just common sense. We cannot
tell you yet how many summaries you have submitted. But of course if there are
any DOCUMENTED changes required (documented only from evidence), we will make
the changes. After the final, there will be a spreadsheet posted in a public
location, and you can check the number of credits you were given based on your
submissions.
Review Questions As with the review
questions I have passed out before each of the midterms, I have developed these
questions to help you frame the important ideas in the course. The actual questions may be similar or
even identical to these, but I want you to use the questions as a starting
point. If you can answer the
questions below you should do well on the short answer portion of the final
examination. Again--some of the
questions that are listed below reflect the topics I planned to cover at the
time that I wrote up these review questions, but of course they may not reflect
what I actually talked about during lecture. You will be responsible
for the following material on Midterm 3: € Midterm
1 review questions on research methodology (correlational vs. experimental
research; material on television violence and behavior) (Questions 11-40). This is really the only material that
is repeated for Midterm 3—because those topics are so important. I have included them below. € Lecture material since
Midterm 2. This includes the
material on errors and biases in reasoning (available
on the Psych 101 web site). You will
be responsible for that material on errors and biases in reasoning (Qs 266-282
below).
I
will provide the FINAL list of review questions relevant to MT3 on the Psych 101
website (and on the Final Home Page) by Monday, December 11 (I don't expect it
to differ from the questions below except maybe by a couple of questions). And,
as indicated above, I will provide the answers on MP3 by the next day. PLEASE
CHECK THE PSYCH 101 WEBSITE OFTEN FOR UPDATES. Questions from Midterm 1 review questions on
research methodology (Questions #11-40): 11. What is an operational
definition? What are the two
criteria that scientists use to evaluate operational definitions? 12. Know the distinction between
validity and reliability. 13. How does the story of Broca's
brains (he used brain size as a measure of intelligence) illustrate the
difference between validity and reliability? 14. Contrast correlational
research with experimental research:
what are the benefits and pitfalls of both? 15. What feature of a good survey
allows us to generalize the results of the survey to the population? 16. What is a representative
sample? Why is it important in
survey research? 17. How did the Literary
Digest poll of 1936 demonstrate the importance of random sampling
(obviously, you don't have to know the numbers--just the principle!) 18. How did the Literary
Digest poll of 1936 demonstrate problems with biased samples? 19. What were the biases that led
to the problems with the Literary Digest poll of 1936? 20. How does the Literary
Digest poll of 1936 illustrate the difference between reliability and
validity (hint: sampling error is
related to reliability and accuracy is related to validity)? 21. What is sampling error? 22. What is the law of large
numbers? (You don't have to know
the numbers--just the principle!) 23. What is the relationship
between sample size of a survey and sampling error (and precision)? What is the relationship between
proportion of the population sampled and sampling error/precision (i.e., the
sample-to-population ratio)? 24. What does it mean for two
variables to be positively correlated?
Negatively correlated? Uncorrelated? 25. What are the three causal
possibilities when there is a correlation between two variables? 26. What is a spurious
correlation? What does the "third
variable" refer to? 27. Know how to identify the
parts of an experiment:
conditions, independent variable, dependent variable. 28. Why is random assignment to
conditions so important in an experiment?
What does it eliminate? 29. Know the distinction between
random sampling (in survey research) and random assignment (in
experimental research) 30. What are the benefits of
experimental research? What does
it not tell us? 31. Define external validity and
internal validity. Define
discriminant validity. 32. What is reliability? Why do we care about it? 33. Describe the modeling
hypothesis and catharsis hypothesis concerning the effects of violent
television on behavior. 34. What is the conclusion of the
correlational studies of Eron (1963) regarding the effects of television on
behavior? 35. What is the conclusion of the
experimental studies of Bandura et al. (1961)? 36. How would you critique the
Bandura et al. bobo doll study on the basis of external validity? 37. How would you critique the
Bandura et al. bobo doll study on the basis of internal validity? 38. How did the Liebert and Baron
study do better than the Bandura et al. study in external validity? 39. How did the Liebert and Baron
study do better than the Bandura et al. study in internal validity? 40. Is
there a causal relationship between violent television and aggressive behavior,
according to reviews of the existing literature? Is it strong? New review questions on material since Midterm 2: 206. What is the definition of learning? 207. Why do we have to be careful in concluding
that animal behavior that seems intelligent/learned really is due to
learning? Give some examples of
animal behaviors that we could be misinterpreting. 208. Describe Pavlov's experiments. 209. Know how to identify the various components
in classical conditioning. 210. Know the stages of classical conditioning. 211. How can classical conditioning be used to
cure enuresis (bedwetting)? 212. What are the differences between classical
conditioning and instrumental (operant) conditioning? 213. Describe what you would do to train an
animal to perform complex behaviors. 214. What is shaping? What are successive approximations? 215. Know the characteristics of the various
schedules of reinforcement. 216. What is the partial reinforcement
effect? What are some examples in
everyday life? 217. How can the principles of reinforcement
explain how well-meaning parents attempting to help their child get to sleep
can inadvertently create a situation where the child actually stays up for
longer. 218. What happens when you provide pigeons with
fixed interval reinforcement? 219. How does superstitious behavior emerge in
pigeons and in people? 220. What did Watson claim about the possibility
of conditioning any stimulus to any response? 221. How did Garcia's studies concerning
biological constraints in learning argue against Watson's broad
claims about learning? 222. Does punishment work? Describe the Freedman (1965) forbidden
toy experiment. 223. What is the overjustification effect
(Lepper, Greene, & Nisbett, 1973)?
What does it tell us about the costs of reward? 224. What do the forbidden toy experiment and the
overjustification effect experiment suggest about using extrinsic rewards and
punishments in raising children? 225. What
was Ebbinghaus's approach to the study of memory? Why did he use nonsense syllables? 226. What
was Bartlett's criticism of Ebbinghaus's approach? What was Bartlett's own approach? What kind of stimuli did he employ in his research? 227. Which
approach has been more influential in the modern studies of memory? 228. How
is information processing in a computer analogous to information processing in
a human? Describe the stages of
human information processing (encoding, storage, and retrieval). 229. Describe
the difference between short-term memory and long-term memory. 230. What
is a chunk? 231. How
many chunks can you retain in short-term memory? 232. When
do chess experts differ from chess novices in their memory for chess positions,
according to deGroot (1965)? 233. In
studies of free recall, what is the shape of the serial position curve? 234. What
is the primacy effect? What is the
recency effect? What accounts for
each of these effects? 235. What
kind of coding is used in STM?
What kind of coding is used in LTM? 236. What
experimental evidence is there that STM is acoustic? 237. What
is working memory? 238.* Describe
how damage to the hippocampus (remember Clive Wearing and H.M.) provides
physiological evidence for the STM-LTM distinction (covered on MT1 so you don't
need to know this again) 239.* What
is the distinction between declarative and procedural memory? How do studies of hippocampal damage
support this distinction? (covered on MT1 so you don't need to know this again) 240. What
is the difference between anterograde amnesia and retrograde amnesia? 241. How
does a head injury cause retrograde amnesia? 242. Why
don't you fully recover your memory after a head injury has caused retrograde
amnesia? What will you be least
likely to remember? 243. What
is trace consolidation? What are
the two possible explanations for this (encoding/storage and
retrieval--remember the cement vs. library catalog card analogies)? 244.* Which
memory (declarative or procedural) seems to be disrupted by damage to the
hippocampus? (covered
on MT1 so you don't need to know this again) 245.* Can
amnesic patients learn? What is
the experimental evidence for this?
How does this evidence support a distinction between declarative and
procedural memory? (covered on MT1 so you don't need to know this again) 246. What
is depth of processing? How is it
related to memory? 247. What
is a mnemonic device? 248. How
is imagery important in mnemonic devices? 249. Describe
Luria's patient, S., who had extraordinary memory. 250. What
is synesthesia? 251. How
was S. able to remember virtually everything he was ever exposed to? What was the down-side of this
wonderful memory? 252.* What
is photographic memory (eidetic memory)?
Is there any evidence for it? 253. What
do memory experts excel in? 254. What
is the relationship between accuracy in memory and confidence in memory? 255. What
does the research by Loftus on leading questions suggest about how easy it is
to change people's memory and even to create false memories? 256. What
does it mean to say that memory is a reconstructive process? 257. Describe
the study by Loftus and Palmer on the effects of a leading question on
perceptions of the speed of a car that caused an accident. 258. Describe
the study by Loftus, Miller, and Burns on the effects of a leading question on
creating a memory of an object that was never there (the stop vs. yield sign). 259. How
does the research by Loftus and others demonstrate the problem with leading
questions in a crime investigation? 260. How
does the research by Loftus and others on creating false memories in university
students demonstrate that there is a strong possibility of creating false
memories among clients whose therapists are encouraging them to remember
instances when they were sexually abused as a child, even though they currently
have no such memories? 261. What
does the research (by Ceci and others) suggest about the accuracy of children's
memory? 262. How
can well-meaning therapists actually create false memories in their clients? 263. How
do the studies of memory distortion and suggestibility contradict our
intuitions about memory? 264. What
is a more accurate model of memory? 265. When
people make claims about events during childhood that they have suddenly
remembered as adults, what is the dilemma of the justice system? (and of
psychologists who testify on the basis of research?) How is the signal detection model helpful in understanding
this dilemma? These questions
are from the Lecture Notes on Errors and Biases in Reasoning (see the Psych 101
Website) 266. What
is epistemology? 267. What
is the distinction between descriptive theories and prescriptive (normative)
theories? 268. How
good do people think they are at making judgments and decisions (Fong and
Klein)? 269. Describe
Nisbett and Wilson's (1977) research on awareness of mental processes. Are people good at recognizing what
influences their judgments and behavior? 270. What
is the traditional/philosophical explanation for errors in reasoning? What is the cognitive explanation for
errors? 271. What
is a cognitive heuristic? 272. What
is the availability heuristic (Kahneman and Tversky)? How do vividness effects demonstrate the existence of the
availability heuristic? 273. How
do vividness effects account for people's estimates of the prevalence of
various causes of death? 274. Describe
the Reyes, Thompson, and Bower (1981) study that used a mock jury trial to
demonstrate the effects of vividness. 275. What
is the representativeness heuristic (Kahneman and Tversky)? 276. Describe
the lawyer-engineer problem that demonstrates that people are using similarity
judgments and fail to use base-rate information. 277. Do
people believe in the validity of interviews? What do the studies of interviews conclude about their
validity? Why do people continue
to believe in interviews? 278. What
are framing effects? Review the
handout that I passed out on Kahneman and Tversky's experiment on framing
effects. 279. What
is the perseverance effect?
Describe the Ross et al. (1975) study (suicide notes). 280. What
happens when a theory you hold is completely disconfirmed? Do you still believe it? 281. What
is the effect of mixed evidence on the belief in a strongly-held theory? (Lord,
Ross, and Lepper, 1979) 282. What
does the overconfidence demonstration tell us about our beliefs in our
judgmental ability? What is the
moral of this story? 283. Are
you ready for the final now?