Psychology 101: Introductory Psychology
Fall 2006-- Professor Geoffrey T. Fong
Lecture Outline #11--Errors and Biases in Reasoning
|
I will not lecture on errors and biases in reasoning in class,
so I am presenting that material here--including this lecture outline
and the actual lecture.
You are responsible for the material in this lecture.
Click here to go to the errors and biases lecture
|
I. General Comments on Epistemology
A. The distinction between descriptive and prescriptive (normative) theories
II. The Importance of Studying Inferential Errors
A. Our belief in the validity of our reasoning ability makes us
vulnerable to making errors
1. Fong and Klein (1995)--People think that they are really
terrific at making social judgments.
III. Explanations for errors in reasoning
A. Traditional/philosophical explanations--Aristotle, Plato...to Freud
B. Cognitive explanations--people are limited capacity information
processors
C. Kahneman and Tversky's research on judgmental heuristics
(availability heuristic;
representativeness heuristic)
IV. People sometimes fail to understand the true causes for their
actions/judgments
A. Nisbett and Wilson (1977): People lack introspective access to the
true causes of their behavior
IV. The Availability Heuristic
A. Vividness effects--Volvo-Saab thought experiment; Reyes, Thompson,
and Bower (1981)
B. Media effects
V. The Representativeness Heuristic
VII. Theories and Hypotheses Influence Judgments and Decisions
VIII. Despite the Presence of Errors and Biases in Reasoning, People are
Overconfident in their Judgments and Decisions
IX. What Can We Do to Improve Judgments and Decisions?
A. Recognize that we are often wrong.
B. Understand the nature of errors and biases in judgment, particularly
the role of theories
C. Understand the importance of statistical principles in making
judgments (Fong, Krantz, & Nisbett, 1986)